<![CDATA[Comunidad MIPE-DIPE: Boote&BeileScholarsBeforeResearchers_CentralityDissertationLiteratureReview_2010.pdf]]> https://comunidad.psyed.edu.es/file/view/1779/bootebeilescholarsbeforeresearchers-centralitydissertationliteraturereview-2010pdf https://comunidad.psyed.edu.es/file/view/1779/bootebeilescholarsbeforeresearchers-centralitydissertationliteraturereview-2010pdf Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:39:06 +0100 https://comunidad.psyed.edu.es/file/view/1779/bootebeilescholarsbeforeresearchers-centralitydissertationliteraturereview-2010pdf <![CDATA[Boote&BeileScholarsBeforeResearchers_CentralityDissertationLiteratureReview_2010.pdf]]> En torno a las revisiones de la literatura científica y a su importancia en la investigación.

This article suggests criteria to evaluate the quality of dissertation literature reviews and reports a study that examined dissertations at three universities. Acquiring the skills and knowledge required to be education scholars, able to analyze and synthesize the research in a field of specialization, should be the focal, integrative activity of predissertation doctoral education.

]]> César Coll